Ariffin HJ (2002) Interpretation of the archaeological excavation and
the Painted Cave at Niah National Park, Sarawak, Malaysia, Hornbill
5:nn-nn
INTERPRETATION OF THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL EXCAVATION AND
THE PAINTED CAVE AT NIAH NATIONAL PARK, SARAWAK, MALAYSIA
ARIFFIN BIN HJ. JERAIEE1
SUMMARY
The caves in Niah National Park are world famous for
their archaeological finds, which include the first evidence of human
settlement in the area. Visitors’ appreciation and respect for the
site are vital for the conservation of the cave, but there is little to
see at the excavation apart from traces of digging.
Sixty local and 150 foreign visitors were surveyed to
find out about their prior knowledge of the site and the scope for
interpretation. All knew that the caves were important historically and
were concerned that the sites be protected. They thought that
interpretive signs at the sites in the caves would be an appropriate way
to provide information to visitors. When asked, all agreed that the
remains of Niah Man found at Niah Great Cave should be returned to Niah,
either to the excavation site or to the nearby museum.
INTRODUCTION
In 1957, the curator of Sarawak Museum, Tom Harrison,
led archaeological excavations at West Mouth of the Niah Great Cave,
which showed lots of evidence of early human settlement in the area. The
oldest modern human remains discovered in South East Asia were found,
making the park one of the most important archaeological sites in the
world. The nearby Painted Cave, with ancient paintings on the cave walls
overlooking the remains of wooden "death ships" also
contribute to the significance of the Niah cave.
Niah Great Cave was listed as a National monument in
1958. In 1974, 3,100 hectares of surrounding rainforest and limestone
hills were included to form Niah National Park. The Park has been
proposed as a World Heritage Site of both cultural and natural
significance.
Visitors’ appreciation and respect for the site are
vital for the conservation of the cave and the Park. Good interpretation
can help tourists and the general public to understand the significance
of the archaeological site, and the importance of preserving it for
future generations to appreciate and for further research by
archaeologists.
METHODOLOGY
Personal interviews with local and foreign visitors
after visiting the cave were conducted at entrance of Great Caves, at
the Park canteen and at the office. During April, May and June 2001, 60
local visitors and 150 foreign visitors aged 20 and above were
interviewed, out of a total of 1516 local and 2768 foreign adult
visitors for the three-month period.
The interviews were structured around the following
three questions:
1. How did you get to know about Niah Cave?
2. What do you think of the archaeological site
and the painted cave?
3. Where should the remains, skull, bones and
artefacts of 40,000 years old Niah Man be housed or displayed?
VISITORS' RESPONSES
Foreign visitors knew about Niah from the Lonely
Planet guidebook or from friends who had been to Sarawak. Most local
respondents had "always known" about Niah Caves.
All respondents wanted the archaeological site to be
maintained and preserved. Foreign visitors added that this was important
because it was known world-wide. Many commented on the presence of
rubbish within the sites. All recommended informative signs in Malay and
English, especially around the archaeological sites, to show where the
various items had been found during excavation. All respondents wanted
the Painted Cave to be preserved and the fencing maintained to prevent
damage and vandalism. They asked for signs explaining the meaning of the
paintings on the wall.
Respondents also thought the skull, bones, artefacts,
etc of Niah Man should be returned to the excavation site or to the Niah
museum.
CONCLUSION
These archaeological sites are slowly degrading and
an effort from NPWD and the Museum is needed to rectify problems. The
adult visitors surveyed were concerned about the preservation of the
sites, and more interpretive signs at the excavation site and the
Painted Cave explaining the archaeological details would heighten their
appreciation and increase their support for the necessary measures. |