Lewiin R (2001) The use of Fibreglass Reinforced Products for walkways
and handrailings at Tanjung Datu National Park, Sarawak, Hornbill
5:nn-nn
THE USE OF FIBREGLASS REINFORCED PRODUCTS FOR WALKWAYS
AND HANDRAILINGS AT TANJUNG DATU NATIONAL PARK, SARAWAK
LEWIIN ANAK ROMAN1
SUMMARY
Fibreglass Reinforced Products (FRPs) were introduced
to Sarawak only about three years ago, and were used to construct a
plankwalk at Tanjong Datu National Park. The Division was keen to try it
for plankwalks and bridges because belian (ironwood) is heavy and
difficult to transport to remote areas, and other timber species rot
very quickly.
FRP components are about half the weight of belian
but, unlike belian, require concrete footings. They are five to six
times the price of belian. Construction requires skilled workers and
proper health precautions, as the material is irritant and toxic. The
material is not biodegradable and cannot be recycled. It is degraded by
light and humidity, becoming brittle and delaminating, and has a life
span of about 15 years.
It is hoped that this information will provide a
basis for decisions on using FRPs as an alternative to belian timber for
construction purposes in the national parks.
INTRODUCTION
Belian timber (Eusideroxylon zwageri) can
withstand local weather conditions but this timber is heavy and getting
more scarce and expensive. Fibreglass reinforced products (FRPs) were
introduced as an alternative for the construction of 212m of plankwalk
and 825m of handrailing along the Telok Melano Trail at Tanjung Datu
National Park. The trail connects park headquarters to Telok Melano
village, where a homestay programme operates. Construction took place
between December 2000 and May 2001.
This paper reports on the construction methods used
for FRPs, and the advantages and disadvantages compared with belian
timber.
FIBREGLASS REINFORCED PRODUCTS
FRPs are composed of a resin matrix reinforced by
embedded glass fibre that enhances the strength, flexibility or rigidity
of the product. The resins are very toxic and contain chemicals that
cause skin irritation, which is a health hazard and a common problem for
the workers.
The features claimed for the products are i)
corrosion resistance, ii) high impact resistance, iii) light weight, iv)
electrical insulation, v) low thermal conductivity, and vi) low
maintenance.
A range of mouldings of different shapes and sizes
are available, including I-beam, U-channel, square hollow tube and
angle. The material can be given an anti-skid surface, somewhat like
coarse sandpaper, and this was used for the floorboards. Various colours
are available: for the Telok Melano trail, floorboards were green and
other components brown.
Concrete is used for the footings, while L-angles,
glue and stainless steel bolts and nuts are used for joining the
components. Nails cannot be used. Aluminium U-channel is needed
underneath the FRP floorboards where they are screwed to the joists. The
material can be cut with a steel saw or electric cutter and bolt-holes
drilled with a standard electric drill.
COMPARISON OF BELIAN AND FRPS
Comparison of weight and price per metre for
materials typically used for posts, beams and floorboards are shown in
table 1. As can be seen, FRPs are significantly lighter, which is
important in remote areas where transport costs are high. On the other
hand, an FRP plankwalk requires more concrete for footings than a belian
plankwalk, which would increase the weight of materials. FRP components
are much more expensive then belian, being five or six times the price.
Table 1: Weight and price of plankwalk components
| |
weight (kg/m) |
price (MYR/m) |
|
FRP 101x101x10mm I-profile (post or beam) |
5.4 |
300 |
|
Belian 100x100mm (post) or 200x50mm (beam) solid |
10.1 |
47 |
|
FRP 78x19x4mm U-channel (floorboards) |
0.65 |
40 |
|
Belian 100x25mm solid (floorboards) |
2.5 |
8.40 |
Although it is faster to cut FRP profiles than belian,
it is difficult to join the structures as nails or simple joints cannot
be used. Skilled labour is needed, and park staff are currently not
skilled in this work. Personal protective equipment has to be used, as
the sawdust and swarf are toxic and irritant. FRP columns require
reinforced concrete footings, whereas belian can be placed directly in
the soil.
It is expensive to repair damaged walkways, bridges
and hand railings (eg after a tree-fall) because the FRP components have
to be ordered from West Malaysia.
Fibreglass Reinforced Products will degrade if
exposed to light and become brittle with age. They have a life span of
about 15 years (Ian Domigan, pers.comm.). They splitter very easily and
when cracked they need to be repaired quickly as water will cause them
to swell and delaminate.
FRPs cannot be recycled and are not biodegradable.
Belian sawdust, off-cuts and even old structures abandoned in the forest
are not an ecological problem (though they may be unsightly). This is
not true of FRPs, which are not environmentally friendly.
CONCLUSION
The use of Fibreglass Reinforced Products for the
nature trail at Tanjung Datu National Park provides experience in the
construction techniques and an opportunity to assess its advantages and
disadvantages compared with belian timber.
FRPs look appropriate in the natural environment
except for the cold green colour of the U-channel floorboards. However,
they cannot be recycled, are not biodegradable, and are toxic. They are
light but much more expensive than belian.
Monitoring of the FRP plankwalk will allow all the
factors to be weighed, and decisions about whether the Department will
use them in other parks or reserves in future will depend on priorities
in each case. |