Remli A (2001) Recreational activities of local visitors at Lambir
National Park, Malaysia, Hornbill
5:nn-nn
RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES OF LOCAL VISITORS AT LAMBIR
NATIONAL PARK, MALAYSIA
REMLI BIN ADENAN1
SUMMARY
Lambir National Park is a popular destination for
local visitors during weekends and public holidays. The park offers a
variety of activities such as picnicking, swimming, jungle walking and a
tree tower to fulfil the recreational needs of the local visitors.
Almost all visitors go to the Latak Waterfall to swim
and picnic, and do not go anywhere else in the park. The management is
concerned about the need to encourage people to explore more of the
park. In order to assist with this, a questionnaire survey was carried
out of those people who did go further into the park, to find out their
destinations, activities and their opinions of the attractions.
The other waterfalls and tree tower were most
popular. These are all near the entrance and the main trail to Latak
Waterfall. The most common activities were jungle walking and
picnicking.
More research is needed to find out why visitors go
to these sites, perhaps using focus groups or semi-structured
interviews. Almost all (91%) are return visitors, so they must have good
reasons to come back.
The overall conclusion is that visitors can be
encouraged to go to other sites near the entrance and car park, but few
will use the distant sites.
INTRODUCTION
Lambir National Park is a popular destination for
local visitors during weekends and public holidays. The park offers a
variety of activities such as picnicking, swimming, jungle walking and
tree tower viewing to fulfil the recreational needs of the local
visitors. In the year 2000, there were 29,533 visitors to the park, more
than 80% of whom were Malaysians.
Most of the visitors who came to the park were
day-trippers. Apart from the Latak Waterfall which is most popular, the
other places visited included First Waterfall, Second Waterfall, Tree
Tower and the historical Oil Well site. This research aims to identify
the pattern of activities and places the visitors go.
METHODOLOGY
The survey was conducted in May and June 2001, and
Saturdays, Sundays and public holidays were chosen for the survey as
these are the days when peak numbers come to the park. Self-completion
exit questionnaires in English and Bahasa Malaysia were designed for
this purpose. Each group of visitors who had been to recreational sites
other than the Latak Waterfall filled in the form after they returned
from their activities in the park. The respondents of the survey were
local visitors who resided in Miri town, Sibuti, Bakong, Batu Niah and
the surrounding plantation areas. Questionnaire forms were distributed
until 100 completed responses were returned.
RESULTS
The survey showed that most groups of visitors (89%)
at Lambir National Park came from Miri, where the population is higher
than the others; 4% came from Sibuti, 4% from nearby plantations, 2%
from Batu Niah and 1% from Bukit Song. Only 9% were first time visitors.
The recreational sites visited are shown in Table 1 (the total is more
than 100 because some groups visited more than one site). The main activities
are shown in Table 2.
Table 1 : Recreational sites visited
|
Recreational sites visited |
Number of groups |
|
First Waterfall |
44 |
|
Second Waterfall |
41 |
|
Tree Tower |
41 |
|
Oil Well Site |
8 |
|
Bukit Pantu Trail |
3 |
|
Main Trail |
2 |
|
Lambir Summit Trail |
1 |
|
Total |
140 |
Table 2 : Activities
|
Activities |
Number of groups |
Number of visitors |
|
Jungle Walking |
39 |
172 |
|
Picnicking |
23 |
168 |
|
Swimming |
19 |
88 |
|
Research |
2 |
60 |
|
Nature Education |
3 |
45 |
|
Trekking |
9 |
44 |
|
Birdwatching |
3 |
8 |
|
Watching Wildlife |
2 |
8 |
|
Total |
100 |
593 |
Respondents were asked if they would recommend their
friends to come to Lambir, and what they would say to persuade them to
come. Only 23 of the respondents gave recommendations and these were
very vague, with 15 saying it was a nice, interesting, or beautiful
place. Three mentioned peacefulness, and others mentioned exercise,
education, natural forest and coolness.
DISCUSSION
The response rate was high as I was there to
administer it with the help of the park staff, and most people completed
the form before leaving the Park. A few questionnaires were distributed
with stamps and self-addressed envelopes, but these were not returned.
Some of the questionnaires were filled by interviewing the visitors to
get their responses.
The most popular sites (other than Latak Waterfall)
include First Waterfall, Second Waterfall and the Tree Tower. These
sites are close to the entrance and take less than half an hour to
reach. Very few people used the long trails.
About 48% of the groups went jungle walking or
trekking. Another 40% went picnicking and swimming, 18% for education
and ‘research’. These represent groups with different needs and
should be considered individually to better cater for their preferences.
The recommendation part of the questionnaire did not
work out, perhaps because the respondents did not have time to think
about it. Other research methods such as interviews may give better
information. Maybe there is a need to invite people to form focus groups
for different activities.
CONCLUSION
It is possible to divert people from Latak Waterfall.
The needs of trekkers and those interested in natural history as well as
picnickers should be considered. The facilities or recreational sites
need to be close to the car park, as very few people used the long
trails. The questionnaire survey did not get good information on what
people felt were the attractions of Lambir National Park; a study with
semi-structured interviews or focus groups would be a useful
alternative.
|