Roy M (2001) Viewing platform at the summit of Gunung Serapi, Kubah National Park, Malaysia, Hornbill
5:nn-nn
VIEWING PLATFORM AT THE SUMMIT OF GUNUNG SERAPI, KUBAH
NATIONAL PARK, MALAYSIA
ROY MASON1
SUMMARY
This study investigated visitors’ opinions of the
existing platform at Gunung Serapi, in view of proposals to construct a
larger observation tower at Kubah National Park.
Kubah National Park is easily accessible from Kuching
with public transport, and visitors can then walk up to the platform at
Gunung Serapi. The platform provides views over Kuching city, tropical
rainforest, the coastline and the mountain range marking the border with
Indonesia.
During the three months survey, a total of 57
visitors were interviewed as they left the Park to find out whether they
were aware of the observation tower, why they had visited it, and
suggestions for improvement.
More than half the respondents thought the platform
was good, but some (21) suggested that it should be higher or bigger.
Some requested additional facilities (in particular, toilets) at the
summit. Several commented on the safety of the existing platform.
INTRODUCTION
Kubah National Park is located on the Sarawak State
Land which is about 24 Km from Kuching city. To reach the Park
Headquarters, one can take a commercial bus or a taxi. At the park near
the summit of Gunung Serapi, which is 787.8m high, is a small viewing
platform constructed using belian timber. The state government propose
to construct a larger observation tower at this site at a cost of RM 1
million.
The existing platform is three stories high with a
total height of 6.16m. The actual top level viewing platform measures
1.28m x 1.8m and is designed to accommodate only six adults. The
platform was constructed in 1996 by park labourers. The design was
drafted by the Officer-in-Charge of Kubah National Park and approved by
the National Parks and Wildlife Officer, Kuching.
Visitors can reach the platform by walking for three
hours along a concrete road. Visitors can also drive up to the site with
approval from NPWD in Kuching. From the platform visitors can see good
views of Kuching city, Gunung Santubong, the coastline of west Sarawak,
and Pueh mountain.
The objectives of this research were to find out if
visitors were aware of the existence of the viewing platform, how many
are using it, and whether the platform provides a good experience for
visitors.
METHODS
Questionnaires were designed and were used for
interviewing visitors as they left the park. The interviews were
conducted during weekends and public. This is to identify the number of
visitors climbing to the summit. The respondents interviewed were
categorised as children (12-17 years), adults (18-45 years), senior (46
to above) and male or female. Local and foreign visitors were included
provided they spoke English.
RESULTS
A total of 57 respondents were interviewed during the
three month period from April to June 2001. From the 57 respondents 47
were male and 10 females. There were four foreigners from the 57
respondents.
Thirty-five or 61% respondents had climbed to the
summit. Those that climbed the summit were asked the main reason for
going up to the summit. Their reasons were for physical fitness (20
respondents), looking at the surrounding views (26), observing wildlife
(3) and socialising (6).
Of the 35 that climbed to the summit, 26 said that
this was their first climb and nine respondents said that they had
climbed several times. Only 31 people climbed onto the platform. The
reasons for not going onto the platform were: did know about the
platform (one person), too tired to go up (one person), and the platform
was too crowded (two people).
The respondents had different opinions about the
standard of the platform. Nineteen said it was good, six said it was bad
and 10 said it was neither good or bad: more than half liked the
platform. They expressed concern over safety and maintenance, in
particular the strength of railings and rotten planks. The respondents
suggested improvements to the platform, as shown in Table 1, and also
other facilities they thought should be put up at the summit, as shown
in Table 2.
Table 1. Respondents’ suggestions for improvement
|
Types of improvements |
Number of respondents |
Comment |
|
planks need replacement |
5 |
|
|
platform should be made bigger |
11 |
|
|
platform should be made higher |
10 |
|
|
additional/better handrails |
10 |
|
|
construct a roof on the top of the platform |
4 |
|
|
a telescope to be installed at the platform |
2 |
1 suggested coin operated telescope |
|
the platform should be moved to a new location |
3 |
|
|
rubbish bins to be supplied |
3 |
|
|
platform to be painted |
1 |
|
Table 2. Respondents’ suggestions for additional
facilities at the site
|
Types of facilities |
Number of visitors |
|
Toilets |
18 |
|
Huts |
14 |
|
Transportation |
2 |
|
Benches |
1 |
|
Rubbish bin |
5 |
|
Fence the platform |
1 |
|
Plant flowers around the platform area |
1 |
|
Canteen |
4 |
|
Water supply |
9 |
|
Telephone booth |
1 |
|
Campsite |
1 |
|
Barbecue pit |
1 |
DISCUSSION
The response for the questionnaire was fairly good as
there is 57 respondent responded to the interview. There were more men
responded to this survey. The most number of respondents that went up to
the summit were between the age of 18 to 45 years old. This group of
people were more energetic and very interested looking for beautiful
scenery besides going for physical fitness by walking to the summit.
With the presence of the viewing platform, visitors
were very keen to walk up to the summit to enjoy the view while resting
after the long walk.
Most visitors or 54% said the platform was good. The
viewpoint was constructed to enable the visitors to enjoy the
surrounding views. The top storey of the platform could accommodate only
six adults at one time, which is insufficient for a big group.
CONCLUSION
The platform is important at this summit point
because it provides better views. Visitors expressed concern over safety
and maintenance that the management should look into.
The platform that was designed for six adults was
sometimes found to be too crowded. A sign should be placed at the bottom
of the viewpoint to warn visitors of the limit and some safety rules for
the visitors to observe when climbing the platform. It would be good if
the viewing platform could be extended so that more people could share
the experience.
It could be useful to find out what other attractions
would interest visitors going up the summit. |