Saifuddin S (2001) Why do visitors go to Matang Wildlife Centre? Hornbill
5:nn-nn
WHY DO VISITORS GO TO MATANG WILDLIFE CENTRE?
SAIFUDDIN BIN SENAWI1
SUMMARY
Matang Wildlife Centre was established for
conservation, and houses a range of confiscated or surrendered wild
animals. The intention is to rehabilitate and release these animals
whenever possible. A great number of visitors visit the Centre every
year, 97% of them Malaysians. Apart from the animal enclosures, the
Centre has an interpretation centre, a nature trail and a picnic area.
A survey was carried out to investigate visitor’s
reasons for visiting Matang, to see if these were consistent with the
purpose of the Centre and the policy of the Department. It was found
that foreign visitors came to Matang to see orang utan and all visited
the animal enclosures. In contrast, all the Malaysian visitors
interviewed went to the picnic area and 40% gave picnicking as the
purpose of their visit.
Providing picnic facilities is not the prime purpose
of the Centre, though it is an opportunity to educate people about
conservation and the role of the Centre. A management plan is required
which recognises the role of the picnic site in attracting large numbers
of visitors while at the same time achieving the conservation objectives
of the Centre.
INTRODUCTION
Matang Wildlife Centre covers an area of 179 hectares
of tropical rainforest at the western corner of Kubah National Park in
the southern part of Sarawak about 35 kilometres away from Kuching, and
is accessible by road.
The main objective of establishing Matang Wildlife
Centre was for the conservation of nature, that is the protection of
flora and fauna of the State. Secondary objectives were research,
education, recreation and nature tourism. The Centre provides facilities
such as an information centre, accommodation, canteen and camping ground
for visitors’ comfort. It also provides activities such as walking
nature trails, visiting animal enclosures and waterfalls and picnicking.
Matang Wildlife Centre houses confiscated or
surrendered wild animals protected under Sarawak’s Wildlife Protection
Ordinance, including terrapin, crocodile, sambar deer, hornbills and
other birds, cat species, sun bear or honey bear, gibbon and orang utan.
The intention is to rehabilitate animals for eventual release, but
certain animals cannot be rehabilitated or are too dangerous to be
released to the forest.
Animals are kept in enclosures surrounded by natural
forest, and can be seen by visitors. A great number of visitors visit
the Centre every year since it was opened to public in 1996, especially
during weekends, public holidays and school holidays. The Centre’s
records show that a total of 253,725 Malaysians and 4,339 foreign
visitors visited Matang Wildlife Centre from 1996 until June 2001, and
in June 2001 alone a total of 8,602 visitors visited the centre. In
2001, over 97% of visitors were Malaysians. Azahari (2001) found that
68% of visitors were return visitors.
A study was carried out to find out why visitors go
to Matang Wildlife Centre and if this is consistent with the effort made
by the National Parks and Wildlife Division to establish the Centre for
visitors to learn, experience and to create awareness of the importance
of nature and wildlife.
METHODOLOGY
Over a period of twenty days in June 2001, a sample
of visitors was surveyed to find out why they visited the centre.
Surveys were done either at the picnic spot or at the information centre.
The interviewer approached visitors who appeared to be free after their
activities.
In addition, data on the number of visitors (foreign
and Malaysian) were extracted from the Centre’s reception records.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
A total of 61 responses to the questionnaire were
recorded. Most of the local people approached were reluctant to be
interviewed, but no one who looked like a foreigner refused to be
interviewed. A total of 34 Malaysians (56%) and 27 foreigners (44%) were
interviewed. There were more male respondents (60%) than female. Most
respondents were aged between 20 and 49, with 34% in the 30-39 age
group.
Foreign visitors came from England (5 respondents),
Germany (5), Australia (3), United States (3), Holland (3), Czech
Republic, Denmark, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Sweden, Switzerland and New
Zealand (1 each). The Centre clearly draws foreign visitors from all
over the world.
Almost all the foreigners (26 out of 27) gave orang
utan as the purpose of their visit. All visited the animal enclosures and
38% had been to the nature trail, while none had been to the picnic spot
or the waterfall. When asked about preferences, foreign respondents gave
the animal enclosures, nature trail and information centre top ratings.
In contrast, most of the Malaysians (14 out of 34,
41%) gave picnicking as the reason for their visit and only 5 mentioned
orang utan. All the local visitors went to the picnic area, although 80%
said they had also visited the animal enclosures (possibly on a previous
visit to Matang). Malaysians gave top rating for preference to the
waterfall, followed by the picnic spot and the information centre.
Malaysian and foreign visitors have different motives
for visiting Matang Wildlife Centre, and are looking for quite different
recreational experiences.
Most respondents showed an interest in other national
parks in Sarawak. Of the foreigners, 35% had already visited other parks
and 85% intended to do so. The corresponding figures for Malaysians were
66% and 51%.
Only 15% of respondents came to Matang alone, while
36% came with family and 48% in (non-family) groups.
CONCLUSION
Malaysian visitors, who make up 97% of all visitors
to Matang, come overwhelmingly to picnic and swim and to visit the
waterfall, which is not the kind of recreational opportunity the Centre
was set up to provide. Matang Wildlife Centre should have a Management
Plan which recognises this, while focusing primarily on conservation.
The best approach might be to zone the Centre, with
the picnic area having a separate entrance and ticketing system to the
animal enclosures, nature trail and waterfall. Carrying capacity at the
picnic spot is estimated to be 200 people at one time, and separate
entrances would allow admissions there to be limited while visitors
could still enter the rest of the Centre.
A strategy should also be implemented to encourage
visitors coming to picnic, especially school groups, to visit the rest
of the Centre and to understand the need to conserve wildlife. Public
support is important for the long term viability of Matang Wildlife
Centre.
Reference
Azahari O (2001) The Perception of Visitors of The
New Entrance Fees to National Parks and Wildlife Centres,
unpublished Research Report, Lincoln University, NZ |