Michael M (2001) International trade in wild flora and fauna: case
studies from Tebedu, Sarawak, Hornbill
5:nn-nn
INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN WILD FLORA AND FAUNA: CASE
STUDIES FROM TEBEDU, SARAWAK
MICHAEL MEGANG1
SUMMARY
International trade in wildlife is now big business
and subject to government control. In view of the increased
international traffic between Malaysia and Indonesia, which also
involves wildlife trading, the Forestry Department had increased
enforcement and patrolling duties at the international land border
crossing at Tebedu to monitor the wildlife trade. As a result, nine
attempts to smuggle wildlife were successfully blocked, and the Customs
Department and other government agencies were motivated to assist in
enforcing wildlife laws. This is shown by the seizure of a total of 2606
turtle eggs by Custom Officers.
INTRODUCTION
Tebedu is located on the Indonesian border,
approximately 120 km from Kuching. It has a population of 8550, mostly
people of the Bidayuh ethnic community. With a good road and modern
facilities, including a new township known as Bandar Mutiara (Pearl
town), and the presence of government agencies, it has become an
important border crossing.
Six government agencies have offices at Tebedu: the
Immigration, Medical, Agriculture, and Road Transport Departments, the
Royal Malaysian Police and the Royal Malaysian Customs and Excise
Department. There are also three semi-government agencies: Harwood
Timber, Malaysian Fisheries Board and Sarawak Timber Industries
Development Corporation.
The laws and regulations implemented by the Royal
Malaysian Custom and Excise Department has several differences with
Sarawak’s Wild Life Protection Ordinance. For example, trade in turtle
eggs is illegal under both laws, but under the Customs act cases are to
be referred to the federal Department of Wildlife and National Parks (PERHILITAN)
while under Sarawak law it has to be referred to the State Forestry
Department. Similarly, under the Customs law import and export of edible
birds’ nests requires a licence from PERHILITAN, while under Sarawak
law a licence from the Forestry Department is required. Under the
Customs law, import and export licences are not required for plants, but
Sarawak laws require licences for the import of timber, phytosanitary
certificates, and licences for protected species of plants. These
differences often cause confusion to the Customs officers in assisting
the Forest Department’s enforcement efforts.
METHODOLOGY
Cases were written up base on events at the
international border crossing at Tebedu between March and June 2001 and
interviews with customs and agriculture officers stationed at Tebedu.
Further information was obtained from the Royal
Malaysian Customs and Excise Practical Guidebook to Custom Duty Order
1997, the Royal Malaysian Custom and Excise Act 1998, Forestry
Department enforcement duties reports since 1999, the annual report for
Tebedu Sub-district, and Serian District Office record of villages and
community leaders for year 2000.
RESULTS
Sawn timber
In April 2001, Forestry Wildlife Enforcement Officers received a
complaint from the public and Customs Officers that protected species of
timber such as menggeris and engkabang were being imported into Sarawak
from Indonesia illegally. The Department sent an official memorandum to
the Customs Department at Tebedu to draw their attention on the
requirement for a licence to import protected timber.
In June 2001, protected timber (menggeris) was still
being imported, but was declared as meranti. Spot-checks at the Harwood
timber depot at Tebedu found 420 pieces of menggeris declared as meranti.
Turtle eggs
In July 2000, a Sarawakian was caught smuggling 30 turtle eggs from
Indonesia. She was fined RM1000 and the eggs were confiscated.
In early 2001, a total of 2606 turtle eggs was
confiscated by Custom Officers on two separate occasions from express
buses travelling from Pontianak to Kuching. No legal action was taken as
nobody claimed the eggs. The eggs were surrendered to the Forestry
Department.
Edible birds’ nests
In December 1999, an Indonesian was caught smuggling 5 small packets
(weight unknown) of processed birds’ nests. She was fined RM175 and
the seized birds’ nests were returned to her.
In August 2000, a British tourist was caught
smuggling 3.5 kilograms of processed birds’ nests. She was fined RM650
and the seized items were returned.
Pangolin scales
In December 1999, an Indonesian was caught smuggling 1.3 kilogram of
pangolin scales. No legal action was taken as the accused had gone back
to Indonesia, but the scales were confiscated.
Incense wood (kayu gaharu)
A Sarawakian was caught smuggling 12 tonnes of incense wood from
Indonesia without a valid license. He was fined RM2,300 and the seized
items were returned.
DISCUSSION
Action by Tebedu Customs
Before 1999, wildlife-related activities at Tebedu were not given
priority by other government agencies, including the Customs Department.
The situation has changed since Forestry Department officers began doing
regular enforcement duties at Tebedu. Customs officers are now more
aware and do take action against any illegal wildlife activities, as
shown by the seizure of turtle eggs on two occasions.
Competence of Customs officers
Two Customs officers attended courses about fauna, the Sarawak Wild
Life Protection Ordinance and the Cites convention. Although they are
now more familiar with the Ordinance, administrative problems remain,
such as custodial procedures.
Illegal activities
Despite regular enforcement and patrolling at Tebedu, illegal
wildlife activities are still prevalent. This may due to –
-
Light penalties: The fines imposed are not a
deterrent. For most wildlife cases at Tebedu, less than 10% of the
maximum fine was imposed, and no jail sentence has ever been given.
-
Seized items are returned: Most of the seized
items (except for turtle eggs) were returned to the offenders after
paying the fine.
These factors mean that the public takes wildlife
offences lightly.
CONCLUSION
Regular enforcement and patrolling are vital as they
motivate other government agencies to assist in enforcing the Wild Life
Protection Ordinance and fills gaps in their knowledge of wildlife law.
It will also show the public that we do not take wildlife cases lightly.
Training and courses should be conducted for officers
of other relevant government agencies based at Tebedu.
The penalties imposed for wildlife offences must the
severe enough to deter offenders. Heavier fines or even jail sentences
should be imposed.
|